BRACED M&E Online Discussion - Answering your questions on the M&E Guidance Notes
During this one-hour session, the Knowledge Manager will respond to Implementing Partners' questions and feedback on the BRACED M&E Guidance Notes. The discussion will primarily be based on the written feedback already received from Implementing Partners. It will take place on Tuesday 28 April from 10-11 am UK time (GMT+1) (noon to 1 pm Nairobi time).A French translation 'button', using Google translate, will be available to enable the participation of French-speaking colleagues.
-
I am Sophie Rigg 'learning and research coordinator' from King's College London working on the Christian Aid projects in Ethiopia and Burkina -
Hi All, I
am Jeremy Stone, Alliance Coordinator, BRACED Myanmar -
Annabelle Powell - Acting for Life
Strengthening resilience of 905,000 pastoralists and agropastoralists, by securing, servicing and promoting transborder livestock mobility across Mauritania, Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger -
Hi this is Atiq Ahmed from ADPC and BRACED KM Asia Focal Point from Bangkok.
-
Hi, the iDE team is: Chiara Ambrosino - Climate Change Adaptation Programme Officer, Daniela Chiriac - Programme Manager and Chris Nicoletti - iDE M&E Specialist. OUr project in Nepal is Called Anukulan
-
-
Hello. I'm Emily Wilkinson. Head of research for the BRACED KM
-
Salut Je suis Raoul YARO, coordinateur MEAL (monitoring evaluaiton accountability learning) de Welthungerhife. Nous somme en consortium avec Self Hepl Africa sur le projet Project Title: “Building the resilience of 620,000 women, children and men in Burkina Faso to climate extremes and improving household food security and income” -
-
Hi all,
Catherine Simonet- researcher for BRACED KM -
Matt sullivan Farm Africa. Project title
Stimulation of market based mechanisms to build the resilience of 339,140 climate vulnerable people in Ethiopia. -
Hi Bettina and everyone- this is an interesting format. Thanks for setting this up.
-
-
Some of you mentioned the limitation of not yet having the French version of the guidance when developing your questions and feedback.
-
What are the resource implications of engaging with the M&E guidance for Implementing Partners, including the KM-led evaluation activities?
-
Now we will start answering the questions you have already sent to us. We will invite your follow up questions at the end of each section. Please be patient.
-
What does the KM envision in terms of survey/evaluation work on project sites? By when? Who is going to lead them? Is there going to be joint planning for these studies?
-
Hi all, Mark Langworthy from Mercy Corps Kenya/Uganda project
-
In order to enable implementation of the guidance by project field staff we need a practical checklist/quick reference to the mandatory and suggested M&E guidance.
-
Q - Are there key entry points at which guidance can be sought on project-level M&E frameworks and plans (prior to formal submission to the FM)?
-
Q - It would be useful to receive further details about the areas of synergy and continuity between KM and FM, specifically in relation to M&E and the learning agenda.
-
Q - Some of you had questions about the nature and timing of the project mid-term and final evaluation guidance and requirements.
-
Q - Many of you responded positively to the BRACED M&E Framework presented and indicated a level of engagement with specific parts/all of it. However, there are some strong concerns about how much work it will be to report against the Areas of Change, 3As and Evaluative Monitoring (Annexes 2-4).
-
Ok -thanks for this input Catherine. I suggest we take a short moment to review some of the specific questions. Then we can move on...
-
Can we ask the ITAD team to briefly respond to the questions below?
-
-
Thanks for the responses in the threads - please scroll down if you had a specific comment to find your answer.
-
-
Ok, I'll continue with the headline clarifications and KM colleagues will continue to answer the follow up questions that are coming up
-
Q - How will the evidence and learning from project and programme M&E be compiled and shared by the KM?
-
Ok - lets move on. Catherine - more headline questions?
-
Q - Can you clarify if the guidance on KPI1 and KPI4 from the interim KM is going to be available in French?
-
You also asked for clarity of the support you can expect from the KM on research, learning and communication (not just M&E), including field visits.
-
excuse me, i just can in. is there any sound conversation???
-
We appreciate this is a lot of information to take in. We are trying to cover as many of your questions are we can in the time. I'll now hand over to Paula and we'll continue answering your follow up questions as the discussion progresses
-
When (exactly) will the revised versions of the toc and logframe be available?
-
Hi all. A comment received from most of you: Gender is not well integrated into the M&E guidelines.
-
While the ITAD team will respond to the remaining open questions, I suggest we can move on to the next topic.
-
Moving on to the ToC: • The theory of change was broadly received positively as it provides a clear explanation of the programme theory of change. A little further explanation is required in how and how often the KM will update the theory of change.
-
Q - Has there been any thought on how to best represent the integrated nature of our projects with the programme theory of change format?
-
Q - Can you please confirm if the note 2 Programme Theory of Change is (not) the final version?
-
Q - Guidance note mentions a “periodic review” of the theory of change, when do you expect this to happen?
-
-
ok - lets have a short moment to review answers to your questions.
-
I see there are some questions still needing to be answered...
Website designed & managed by:
© 2018 | Terms of Use